Posted by
RecknHavic on Saturday, December 08, 2007 1:59:54 PM
Does the first chapter of the Gospel of John refute the theory of evolution ? Did God answer the critics of Intelligent Design thousands of years ago? Is there a clear message encoded w/in the Scripture? Will I continue to write whole paragraphs made up of nothing but questions?
Maybe.
Most Christians (and many non-Christians) know the first few verses of John Chapter 1. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning." The Greek translation of "word" is logos. The Strong's Concordance defines logos as something said (incl. the thought), also reasoning and motive.
The next verses are, "Through Him all things are made. In Him was life and that life was the light of men." While much of the Book of John contrasts the difference between "light" and "darkness" as regards to righteousness vs sin; might there also be another meaning found here. Christ was "the Way, the Truth and the Life" but also the "Light" that shines in the darkness. Remember, prior to the "light", darkness was over the earth, life did not exist.
In Genesis Chapter 1 verse 3 God calls forth the Light. This was on the first "day" of creation, before anything else. Note: on the fourth "day" of creation He made the two great lights (one to rule the day, one to rule the night). The Psalmist speaks of the Light, "For with You is the fountain of life; in Your light , we see light." Without light there can be no life. Was the Psalmist speaking of salvation, or was he speaking of creation? Again w/ the questions.
More on creation in John, "He was in the world, and though the world was made through Him, the world did not recognize Him". We do however acknowledge evolutionary theory, in fact we accept it as the "answer" for the origins of life. Yet, there is no proof that one thing can become another thing. E coli has "evolved" many times, but it's still E coli.
And finally, the Apostle, in the thirteenth verse speaks of creation again, "...children born not of natural decent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God." It is generally accepted (among Christians) that he talks of being "born again" in spirit in this verse, as He does. But, is it possible that the words "not of natural decent" have further meaning? I believe that this is God's answer to the theory of naturalism.
That's my theory and I'm sticking to it.